Persons of Working Age by Sex & 1951 Occupational Order
| Data for 1951 | Sex | |
|---|---|---|
| 1951 Occupational Classification | Male | Female |
| Fishermen |
0
|
0
|
| Agriculture |
75
|
8
|
| Mining & Quarrying |
15
|
0
|
| Ceramics, Glass, Cement, etc |
10
|
0
|
| Coal, Gas, Chemicals |
2
|
0
|
| Metal Manufacturing, Engineering |
134
|
3
|
| Textiles |
0
|
0
|
| Leather, Fur |
363
|
239
|
| Textile Goods, Dress |
33
|
202
|
| Food, Drink, Tobacco |
44
|
6
|
| Wood, Cane & Cork |
33
|
0
|
| Paper, Printing |
8
|
4
|
| Other Products |
4
|
0
|
| Building |
93
|
0
|
| Painters & Decorators |
31
|
0
|
| Administrators, Directors, Managers |
38
|
4
|
| Transport |
83
|
2
|
| Commerce, Finance |
108
|
42
|
| Professional, Technical |
24
|
20
|
| Defence |
27
|
0
|
| Entertainment & Sport |
1
|
0
|
| Personal Service |
29
|
68
|
| Clerks, Typists, etc |
35
|
69
|
| Warehousemen, Storekeepers, etc. |
37
|
53
|
| Stationery Engine Drivers, Stokers |
14
|
0
|
| Workers in Unskilled Occupations |
97
|
11
|
| Other & Undefined |
3
|
0
|
| Retired or Not Gainfully Occupied |
165
|
936
|
This website exists to help people doing personal research projects on particular areas within a locality. So long as you are using our data for only a small number of units, you are not making money out of what you are doing, and you are not systematically re-publishing our data, you do not need to request permission from us, but you do need to acknowledge us as your source with the wording:
"This work is based on data provided through www.VisionofBritain.org.uk and uses historical material which is copyright of the Great Britain Historical GIS Project and the University of Portsmouth".
Where the above statement is included in a web page or similar online resource, the reference to "www.VisionofBritain.org.uk" must be a working hyperlink.
Here we simplify the National Statistics Socio-economic Classfication into just four analytic categories, which we try to present over a very long period. Note that up to 1991 the census focused on levels of "skill", and on whether work was "manual", but since 2001 the focus has instead been on whether work was "routine", making comparisons difficult.